Welcome to Windows Communication Foundation (WCF)
Top Tasks :

WCF Community Bloggers

Browse by Tags

All Tags » Blogsphere » Workflow   (RSS)

  • New and Notable 150!!

    This is it, the big 150! The first New and Notable was on May 19, 2003 , (my first post was March 29, 2002 ) and I paid homage to the master, "I have always admired Mike's ability to look at the world out there and put it all into one great post, The Daily Grind . While I can't pretend to have Mike's writing ability, I would like to start moving to something similar instead of multiple seperate posts." I wish I had the discipline of Mike because if I posted daily I would be well towards 1000 instead of 150-) but hey I'm pretty proud of my record. I love this community and in the last 25 years this community (and Microsoft) have been real good to me and my family. I hope that what I have been picking here has been of good use to the community to keep you informed on key .NET activities as well as the architectural and design side. Thus, I go forth and pick: Entity Framework, ADO.NET 3, Orcas, MVP Summit One of the best writers in the community today is certainly Jeremy Miller . His latest post, MVP Summit Recapped: Linq for Entities, MonoRail, and Shameless Name Dropping , is a fine example of why. In one post, he is able to write quite elequently on complex subjects like the subtle design flaws in Entity Framework 3 and why WF 4 will rock your world. He is able to take a technology, stick to his design principles and stand his ground, educating and helping all involved achieve something better than was there before. He certainly wasn't the only one of us doing that but his post really captures the core design principles of no infrastructure code in business logic classes. Infrastructure is Infrastructure, business logic is business logic. We want the same thing: No marker interfaces, no codegen, no partial classes. Just plain "PO" and support for the Unit of Work pattern. David Laribee also talks on this area and makes clear that its a vision thing that doesn't really compare to NHibernate which is just OR/M; it's a full Read More...
  • Two Types of Service Architects?

    I was goinng to respond to Harry's responses made to Tomas and mine, but Tomas already responded and said everything I would have said: I agree with Tomas that I consider Service Broker a good match for applications with code only in the database, even though it supports more than code completly in the database (I made improper wording in my post indicating it did not) I agree with Tomas that there is a world of difference between "access a database" (99% of apps) vs. database-driven (see Tomas' definition). I said I tend away from these kinds of architectures these days as I see the power of domain-driven architectures (see Nilson). Obviously, there is no one architecture for every kind of problem I also don't get the whole "two types of service architects question" either and that a good architect will choose the right style for the right scenario I'd have to agree with Tomas again what Harry calls "Long running services" are really just a specific case of "Long running processes" and SSSB is too low-level for that. WF and BizTalk get me out of writing that infrastructure that is needed to be built out. But maybe I'm an idiot too and need to get hit with the clue stick as well Technorati Tags: SOA , Service Oriented Architecture , Windows Communication Foundation , Software Architecture , Windows Workflow Foundation , Microsoft Share this post: Email it! | bookmark it! | digg it! | reddit! | kick it! Read More...

Copyright © 2006 Microsoft Corporation. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | Privacy Statement | Contact Us